BurnRate - AI-powered website conversion audits
How It WorksPricingSign in

Hall of Shame

The internet's most brutally critiqued websites. Don't end up here.

Rank 1

Lings Cars

Sensory overloadAnimated GIFs everywhereNo visual hierarchy

A relentless wall of flashing GIFs, autoplay sounds, and clashing colors with no clear path to a single action. Visitors can't tell what to read, click, or trust — every pixel is screaming at once.

15
/100
Rank 2

ARNGREN.net

Wall-of-text layoutNo grid systemInscrutable navigation

Hundreds of products dumped onto one page with no grid, no spacing, and no categorization. Finding anything requires Ctrl+F, and there's no visual hierarchy to guide the eye toward a purchase.

1
/100
Rank 3

Blinkee

Cluttered product pagesInconsistent stylingHard to scan

Product pages cram specs, badges, and promos into every corner with mismatched typography and inconsistent button styles. Shoppers bounce because they can't compare options or find the price.

25
/100
Rank 4

Antique Bottle Collectors

90s era designTiny textBroken layouts

Frozen in the GeoCities era — tiny serif text, tiled backgrounds, and tables-for-layout that collapse on modern screens. Trust signals are nonexistent and there's no mobile experience at all.

15
/100
Rank 5

Headhunter Hair Styling

Dated aestheticConfusing navPoor mobile UX

Outdated visuals and an unclear menu structure bury the one thing visitors want: booking an appointment. On mobile, tap targets are too small and the call-to-action disappears below the fold.

25
/100
Roast Your Site
© 2026 WiredGraphix
How It WorksPricingPrivacyTermsRefundContact